Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 6:08:13 GMT -4
Cristina Fernández Seemed to Have Taken Into Account That an Important Sector of Argentine Society Would Never Vote for Her, That There Are Powerful Actors Within Peronism Who View Her Leadership Style With Suspicion, and That Without Adding to the Entire Peronist Arc, the Victory Was Moving Away in . The Unity of Peronism Was the Key to the Victory Over Macrism. And Thus the Bifurcation Was Reached Between the Presidency (Headed by Alberto Fernández) and the Political Leadership Within Peronism (Embodied in the Now Vice President). Succession Models in Peronism.
Thus, the Existing Antecedents of the From One Leadership to Another Can Be Synthesized Into Three Models: (a) Physical Disappearance of the Leader . In This Case, a Forced Succession is Opened. This is What Happened With Perón. His UK Mobile Database Death in the Presidency, in , Opened a Period of Vacancy and Anomie That Was Not Resolved Until , When Antonio Cafiero Was Elected Governor of the Province of Buenos Aires (Cafiero's Leadership Was Fleeting and Lasted Until His Defeat at the Hands of Menem in ). (B) Natural Leadership Exhaustion . This Happened With Menem in . Many Expected It to Happen With Cristina Fernández After but, as We Noted, She Proved That Her Political Capital Was, if Not Intact, as Valid as Ever, and That.
Kirchnerism Constituted a Stable Faction Within Peronism. . (C) Successful Challenge by a Challenger Who " Retires " the Leader . This Would Apply to Two Cases: Menem With Cafiero in , and Néstor Kirchner With Duhalde in . They Are Somewhat Different Cases, but the Same Logic Operates of a Challenging Figure Who Manages to Occupy the Leadership of the Movement. Future Scenarios in the Frente De Todos the First Conclusion is That the Frente De Todos, as a Political Organization, Does Not Work Well Without Unified Leadership (or Simply Does Not Work). It is Not Easy to Think About the Future in Such an Unfavorable Context and With Such a High Degree of Uncertainty.
Thus, the Existing Antecedents of the From One Leadership to Another Can Be Synthesized Into Three Models: (a) Physical Disappearance of the Leader . In This Case, a Forced Succession is Opened. This is What Happened With Perón. His UK Mobile Database Death in the Presidency, in , Opened a Period of Vacancy and Anomie That Was Not Resolved Until , When Antonio Cafiero Was Elected Governor of the Province of Buenos Aires (Cafiero's Leadership Was Fleeting and Lasted Until His Defeat at the Hands of Menem in ). (B) Natural Leadership Exhaustion . This Happened With Menem in . Many Expected It to Happen With Cristina Fernández After but, as We Noted, She Proved That Her Political Capital Was, if Not Intact, as Valid as Ever, and That.
Kirchnerism Constituted a Stable Faction Within Peronism. . (C) Successful Challenge by a Challenger Who " Retires " the Leader . This Would Apply to Two Cases: Menem With Cafiero in , and Néstor Kirchner With Duhalde in . They Are Somewhat Different Cases, but the Same Logic Operates of a Challenging Figure Who Manages to Occupy the Leadership of the Movement. Future Scenarios in the Frente De Todos the First Conclusion is That the Frente De Todos, as a Political Organization, Does Not Work Well Without Unified Leadership (or Simply Does Not Work). It is Not Easy to Think About the Future in Such an Unfavorable Context and With Such a High Degree of Uncertainty.